Topical Tip:

TT155: Maximising the Potential of Your Business


Prepare to sell - even if you are not going to

One of the best ways to help your business reach its full potential, and maximise its value, is to run it on the basis that one day you will want to sell it. In this way you will instill the best working practices and disciplines, and seek to operate the business at its optimum level. This really will make the business better and more valuable - which is good news for you whether you actually intend to sell or not.


Achieving business excellence

In order to reach this optimum level (i.e. to achieve business excellence) and to ensure that you keep on the right track, you need to continually “groom” the business. In this issue of Topical Tips we examine the general grooming issues that can be applied to any business.
Barnes Roffe Topical Tips

Download PDF


Barnes Roffe Topical Tips:

Topical Tips is designed to be a simple and useful source of ideas and information for clients and contacts of Barnes Roffe LLP. If you are unsure about the implications of any idea contained therein please contact your Barnes Roffe LLP partner. Barnes Roffe LLP cannot take responsibility if the ideas are implemented without its involvement.

TT154: Inheritance Tax relief for War Veterans

Any member or ex-member of the armed forces will know of the so-called ‘covenant’ that is supposed to exist between the military and the country which they serve.  In exchange for the dangers and sacrifices that such people put themselves through, the country promises to look after them.

An often unknown provision of the Inheritance Tax Act forms part of this covenant.  In brief, there is an exemption from Inheritance Tax (“IHT”) for anyone whose death was caused by injury or disease received or aggravated while he or she was on active service. 

This need not mean that death need occur on active service itself. If an injury or disease is received on active service and the individual later dies from that injury or disease, the exemption would still apply. 

One can easily imagine that a disease such as malaria could be the cause of death many years after contracted and many years after military service had ended. 

Such circumstances could still be a cause for a claim to the exemption.

As well as veterans of WWII, there are now veterans of many campaigns, such as Malaysia, Korea, Suez, the Falklands, Northern Ireland and more recently Afghanistan and Iraq.

If any suffer from a condition caused whilst on active service which may be a factor in their eventual death, then the exemption could be claimed.

The exemption is not limited to members of the armed forces, being also available to anyone who “not being a member of any of [the armed forces] was subject to the law governing any of those forces by reason of association with or accompanying any body of those forces.”

Any veteran should record and confirm any condition that adversely affects their health, perhaps in consultation with their family doctor prior to drawing up a will. 

Any death certificate should properly record the extent to which the injuries or disease contributed to death.

Following death, an application must be made to the MOD so that a certificate can be issued which can be presented to HM Revenue & Customs to ensure the estate can be passed on to relatives and loved ones free of IHT.

This is of course a sensitive issue but one worth considering when drawing up plans how an individual’s estate should be dealt with after death.  Having already made sacrifices to support one’s country, it would be comforting to know that those sacrifices were recognised by the taxman!

If you feel that you or someone you know may be able to benefit from this exemption, please get in touch with your Barnes Roffe LLP contact partner or with any member of our specialist tax team.

Download PDF


Barnes Roffe Topical Tips:

Topical Tips is designed to be a simple and useful source of ideas and information for clients and contacts of Barnes Roffe LLP. If you are unsure about the implications of any idea contained therein please contact your Barnes Roffe LLP partner. Barnes Roffe LLP cannot take responsibility if the ideas are implemented without its involvement.

TT153: Cohabitation Agreements

In many respects, the law does not recognise cohabitation. Cohabitants’ rights are usually limited to financial claims on behalf of children and/ or claims in respect of property.

A cohabitation agreement allows unmarried couples to formalise their relationship in a legally enforceable way.

What is a Cohabitation Agreement?

It is a contract between unmarried couples to set out their rights and responsibilities towards each other and for their children during their relationship and when it ends. A Will is part of this good planning.

It can make clear when the cohabitation begins, set out future intentions for housing ownership and occupation, and who will be responsible for household expenses and debts.

The agreement can cover plans for where and with whom the children will live, and the financial arrangements to be made up to the end of their education or training. 

The agreement is acted upon on various triggers which normally include death, marriage, when the living together comes to an end or where one partner leaves home.

How to negotiate a Cohabitation Agreement?

To ensure the cohabitation agreement is contractually binding, specialist legal advice should be obtained by each partner.

Negotiating through the Collaborative law process can be a highly effective way to reach agreement.  This involves each partner and their lawyer signing a Participation Agreement with a commitment to resolve issues by way of 4-way Roundtable meetings.

Nowadays, the Collaborative law process is preferred by many clients to the traditional approach, which involves each lawyer seeking to obtain the best outcome for their client, which can become adversarial and therefore lead to disagreement. By contrast, the Collaborative law process promotes more involvement by clients in the process with lawyers helping to facilitate agreement which therefore reduces the potential for disagreement.
What are the issues with Cohabitation Agreements?

It can be difficult to resolve disputes when the agreement comes to an end and what will be the triggers for reviewing the agreement. There is a tension between allowing sufficient flexibility for review on the occurrence of major life events, such as the birth of children, and rigidly adhering to the terms of the agreement. The agreement should be adapted to meet the couple’s specific requirements.

Other points to consider

Legal advice should be obtained early on in the relationship for couples living together. Where property is owned or occupied by the couple, a Declaration of Trust records the property share of each cohabitant and how they may dispose of each share. It can reflect if different contributions are made by each cohabitant. It is particularly important to make a Will because cohabitation does not automatically entitle the survivor to benefit following death. 

Cumberland Ellis LLP solicitors will be delivering a seminar on cohabitation agreements on Thursday 2 September 2010. If you have an urgent query regarding this issue please contact your Barnes Roffe contact partner.

Download PDF


Barnes Roffe Topical Tips:

Topical Tips is designed to be a simple and useful source of ideas and information for clients and contacts of Barnes Roffe LLP. If you are unsure about the implications of any idea contained therein please contact your Barnes Roffe LLP partner. Barnes Roffe LLP cannot take responsibility if the ideas are implemented without its involvement.

 

TT152: Taxman helps you lose pounds

Anyone who remembers “Fat Fighters” from the “Little Britain” show might find it difficult to treat any story involving Weight Watchers without a smile but this latest story is very serious news indeed for anyone who organises their business using a self employed workforce.

HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) have recently won a tax appeals tribunal hearing which decided that 1,700 team leaders were not, as Weight Watchers had stated, self-employed but were in fact employees of the company.  Not only that, but HMRC have backdated their claim 9 years.  Weight Watchers are appealing to the High Court but in the meantime, their US parent company has been forced to make a provision of £24.5 million to cover the potential additional liabilities if they lose the case.

HMRC have never liked arrangements where a large workforce is treated as self-employed as such treatment saves Employers’ National Insurance and also allows more generous expenses deductions for the workers.

There is no doubt that HMRC are stepping up their campaign in this area.

They are looking at all areas of business (rumours persist that they are now targeting driving instructors) but of particular focus is the construction industry.

An astonishingly biased ‘consultative document’ was produced last year by HMRC with the title “False Self-Employment in Construction” which indicates clearly their thinking process.  Their clear intention is to make it as difficult as possible for anyone working in construction to claim to be self-employed.

So what can be done?

For the construction industry it may be a question of waiting to see what new legislation will be introduced (as it almost certainly will) but for all other sectors it is vital that the contracts under which self-employed individuals are contracted are reviewed and the actual working practices examined.

A series of court cases over the years have established a number of factors which must be looked at, such as control over how and where the work is done, the right of the worker to provide a substitute to do the work, who provides materials and so on.  None of the tests is conclusive on their own and each case will be looked at on its own merits.

If you have any self-employed workers, anything from the cleaner who comes in the evening up to a sales force of hundreds it would be well worth your while reviewing your arrangements.

Download PDF


Barnes Roffe Topical Tips:

Topical Tips is designed to be a simple and useful source of ideas and information for clients and contacts of Barnes Roffe LLP. If you are unsure about the implications of any idea contained therein please contact your Barnes Roffe LLP partner. Barnes Roffe LLP cannot take responsibility if the ideas are implemented without its involvement.

 

TT151: Online Filing of Corporation Tax Documents

When filing a corporation tax return (CT600) with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) companies are also required to file a corporation tax computation and a copy of the accounts that the tax computations are based on.

From 1 April 2011 HMRC require all of these documents, regardless of the companies’ year end, to be filed electronically using a format called “inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language” (iXBRL).

What is iXBRL

It is a method of translating financial information into an electronic format.

Each item within the relevant financial information is given an internationally recognised tag.

From all of these tags an html document (ie a web page) is produced that appears exactly like a hard copy of the document.

The web page can be processed so that databases can be populated with the information contained within it. This will enable efficiency savings on data processors and enable easier analysis of the data.

Government agencies are driving this process forward, HMRC have the above deadlines and Companies House’s have a project to adopt online filing of accounts, no timetable has been set yet, but we anticipate that this is not too far away.

How to produce iXBRL information

There are several ways to produce the financial information in iXBRL format, the two which are going to be most common are:

The accounts production software has pre-tagged fields and the trial balance guides the correct figures to the correct tags, or

A conversion tool can be used, this will need the user to individually assign tags to the correct field throughout the accounts. The scale of this task is shown by the fact that over 5,000 different tags are defined for use in the preparation of accounts.

We believe that the use of conversion tools on Excel and Word documents will be time consuming and fraught with the potential for errors.

At Barnes Roffe our software suppliers for both accounts production and corporation tax compliance are updating their products to contain pre tagged fields. We expect to be able to file the information in the required format well ahead of the 1 April 2011 deadline.

What are the issues with iXBRL

Most accounts and corporation tax software’s are not currently able to prepare these documents. Compliant software is not yet available and is unlikely to be until September 2010.

Companies have a year after their year end to file the documents with HMRC. If a company wants their 30 April 2010 tax computations and accounts filed at the end of the one year filing deadline then they will be in this regime and compliant software will need to be used. This leaves a decision to be made to file the documents early or delay the preparation of the documents until compliant software is available. Neither of which are ideal solutions.

Barnes Roffe LLP will be in touch with their clients to discuss how the new filing regime affects them. If you have an urgent query regarding this issue please contact your Barnes Roffe contact partner.

Download PDF


Barnes Roffe Topical Tips:

Topical Tips is designed to be a simple and useful source of ideas and information for clients and contacts of Barnes Roffe LLP. If you are unsure about the implications of any idea contained therein please contact your Barnes Roffe LLP partner. Barnes Roffe LLP cannot take responsibility if the ideas are implemented without its involvement.

TT150: HMRC Get Tough On Late Payment Of PAYE/NIC

A new regime for penalising businesses for the late payment of monthly Pay As You Earn (“PAYE”), Class 1 National Insurance Contributions (“NICs”) student loan repayment and Construction Industry Tax (“CIS”) liabilities has been introduced from 6 April 2010.

The Current Position

Up to the tax year ended 5 April 2010, if an employer was late in the payment of PAYE & NICs then no interest or penalties would be suffered on the late monthly payments. The only charge would have been an interest charge at the current rate of 3% from 19 April, following the end of the tax year, on any outstanding balance as at that date.

The only exception to this situation was where larger employers were affected by the Mandatory Electronic Payment rules.

The New Penalty Regime

From 6 April 2010 penalties will now apply where PAYE and NICs are paid over late to HMRC. The new rules will apply to in-year payments due from 19 May 2010 onwards and Class 1A and 1B NICs (see below).

If too little tax etc. is deducted under PAYE, again a penalty may apply as full payment will not have been made by the due date.

How Much Will the Penalty Be? - Monthly and Quarterly Payments

For late monthly and quarterly payments, the penalty will start at 1 percent of the late amount and will increase to 4 percent depending on how many times a late payment is made. A penalty will not apply if only one payment is late in any tax year, unless the payment is more than six months late.

In summary the following table illustrates how the penalty will operate on monthly, quarterly payments:

No of times payments
are late in a tax year
Penalty Percentage Amount to which penalty percentages apply
1 No Penalty Total amount that is late in the tax year (ignoring the first late payment in that tax year)
2 - 4 1%
5 - 7 2%
8 - 10 3%
11 or more 4%



Monthly and Quarterly Payments More than Six Months Late

HMRC has stated that it may charge an additional penalty of 5 percent of the amount that is late on any monthly or quarterly payments more than six months late. HMRC may also charge a further penalty of 5 percent if payment has not been made after 12 months.

Annual Payments (for Example Class 1A NICs and with Respect to PAYE Settlement Agreements)

For 2010-2011 tax year, Class 1A NICs must be paid no later than 6 July 2011 and for Class 1B NICs must be paid no later than 19 October 2011.

HMRC state that they will charge up to three penalties of 5% of the amount that is late:

Penalty Notification

When an employer is to be charged a penalty, HMRC will send a letter informing the employer that a penalty is due, how much it is, when it has to be paid, and how to appeal.

HMRC advise that for the first year, it will charge the penalties after the end of the tax year (i.e. sending out the first penalty notices in April or May 2011). However, it is understood that warning letters will be sent out to employers during the year where monthly or quarterly payments are seen to be late or a payment has been made that appears to HMRC to be insufficient.

In respect of future years penalties will be imposed straight away once HMRC has evidence that there has been a late or insufficient payment. HMRC can charge penalties within two years of the due date for payment.

“Lack of Money”

HMRC has a Business Payment Support Service to deal with businesses that anticipate not being able to make payments. By agreement, payments can be spread over a longer period and HMRC will not then charge penalties on those payments covered by that agreement, providing the conditions of the agreement are met. However, HMRC agreement must be obtained before the payment becomes due.

It remains to be seen how HMRC will deploy its new powers on late payment. If the total payment due for one month is late, this would be visible to HMRC. It is less clear though how HMRC will be able to monitor cases where a monthly payment is made on time but is understated and the error corrected by over-paying the tax and NIC due in the next month although this may be picked up on a HMRC inspection of PAYE records.

Please consult your Barnes Roffe LLP contact partner if you need further information or clarification on any matter arising from the above information.

Download PDF


Barnes Roffe Topical Tips:

Topical Tips is designed to be a simple and useful source of ideas and information for clients and contacts of Barnes Roffe LLP. If you are unsure about the implications of any idea contained therein please contact your Barnes Roffe LLP partner. Barnes Roffe LLP cannot take responsibility if the ideas are implemented without its involvement.

 

TT149: VAT on Postal Services - Potential Refund Claim?

Following a legal challenge to the scope of the postal services exemption applied in the UK, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has confirmed that Royal Mail, as the operator providing the public postal service, is the only postal body in the UK eligible to exempt postal services from VAT.

However, the ECJ also ruled that exemption does not apply to supplies made by Royal Mail for which the terms have been individually negotiated or unregulated services. This means that services supplied by Royal Mail which are not subject to any price or regulatory control, which have been treated as exempt, will become liable to VAT at the standard rate with effect from 31 January 2011.

The proposed changes will mean that any service which is individually negotiated or not subject to any price and regulatory control will become liable to VAT at the standard rate. Such supplies include:

• All individually negotiated services;
• Parcelforce services;
• Door-to-door (unaddressed mail);
• Mailroom services.

Although these services will not become liable to VAT at the standard rate until 31 January 2011, HMRC has announced that it will be accepting retrospective claims for VAT refunds on the basis that part of the price paid for postage was in fact VAT, although it was not separately disclosed as such on the invoice.  This means there is a potential refund opportunity for clients with bespoke postage or Parcelforce agreements.  These could include:

• Mail order businesses,
• Online retailers,
• Charities which circulate large volumes of printed material,
• Members organisations,
• Retail financial service providers and
• Print companies that act as a mailing house.

The claim will be calculated on the basis that the claimant has been incurring VAT inclusive standard-rated services for the past four years.

If you believe this applies to you and would like to consider submission of a refund claim, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Download PDF



Topical Tips is designed to be a simple and useful source of ideas and information for clients and contacts of Barnes Roffe LLP. If you are unsure about the implications of any idea contained therein please contact your Barnes Roffe LLP partner. Barnes Roffe LLP cannot take responsibility if the ideas are implemented without its involvement.

TT148: Potential For VAT Recovery On Business Entertainment

A recent opinion from the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has cast doubt on the rule that VAT on business entertainment costs cannot be reclaimed.

The Advocate General (an officer of the court who offers a preliminary opinion) has stated that the Netherlands is not complying with European legislation.  Dutch law blocks VAT claims by reference to the “use” of the goods and services purchased, i.e. business entertaining. Instead the Advocate General suggests that any restriction should be based on the “nature” of the goods and services, e.g. food and drink.  As the UK law is written in the same way as the Dutch law, and an ECJ decision must be applied by all EU member states, the final judgement will be relevant to the UK.

There is no guarantee that the Court will agree with the Advocate General’s preliminary legal opinion but businesses should consider making a protective claim now.  UK VAT law prevents businesses asking for VAT refunds once the cost is more than 4 years old.  Therefore, if your business has incurred significant expenditure on business entertainment you should consider speaking to your Barnes Roffe contact with a view to submitting a protective claim.  If a protective claim is made and handled correctly it should lock in an entitlement to a future refund.  A delayed claim may fall out of time under the 4 year rule, bearing in mind that the decision may be delayed and HMRC is unlikely to make a quick decision on whether to accept a verdict that it does not like.

Business entertainment includes not only taking clients/contacts out for lunch but also the larger corporate hospitality events such as the launching of new products/premises.

Download PDF


Barnes Roffe Topical Tips: